暴风资源

Historic buildings likely to be toppled under post-quake law, PhD finds

Friday 11 June 2021
Recent PhD research from 暴风资源 shows that the Building Amendment Act 2016 provides more logical reasons for demolition of historical buildings than preservation.
Historic buildings likely to be toppled under post-quake law, PhD finds  - image1

Dr Itohan Esther Aigwi.

Last updated: Monday 21 March 2022

Recent聽PhD research聽from 暴风资源聽shows that the聽Building Amendment Act 2016聽provides more logical reasons for demolition of historical buildings than preservation.聽

Dr聽Itohan聽Esther聽Aigwi,聽who recently聽graduated with聽a Doctor聽of聽Engineering, investigated the impacts of the聽Building聽(earthquake-prone聽buildings) Amendment Act 2016 on the retention of historical buildings in New Zealand's provincial city聽centres,聽particularly聽in Invercargill and Whanganui.聽

Following the Christchurch earthquakes in 2010/2011聽the government introduced the聽Building聽(Earthquake-prone Buildings) Amendment Act 2016聽to ensure safety and聽improve聽resilience of vulnerable buildings to future earthquakes.聽聽

Dr聽Aigwi聽says the聽legislation聽put a lot of pressure on historical building owners to decide on either strengthening or abandoning their buildings.聽Those who weren鈥檛 sure of聽return on investment in the seismic assessment and upgrade of their buildings,聽or聽who lack access to public funding through government incentives聽especially felt under pressure聽

鈥淐onsequently, many provincial cities in New Zealand are overwhelmed with so many abandoned earthquake-prone historical buildings in their city centres.鈥澛

Dr聽Aigwi鈥檚聽research聽highlights聽the many advantages historical buildings provide,聽including the conservation of the history and narration of a city鈥檚 existence, sustenance of the聽architectural history, shared cultural identity and significance of a place, economic viability through tourism, and an increased sense of belonging and attachment to a place.聽

The study聽identified that聽in聽areas with聽鈥榳eaker-attachment-to-place鈥櫬爐here were logical arguments in the legislation for demolition聽while areas聽with聽鈥榮tronger-attachment-to-place鈥櫬爁ound stronger reasons for conservation.聽聽

Without any聽maintenance,聽the buildings,聽became聽eyesores聽for local communities.聽However, Dr聽Aigwi聽notes that聽historic buildings聽potentially聽add a lot to聽the character of聽their towns.聽

鈥淚f聽all buildings are demolished and replaced with modern buildings due to economic feasibility issues, the historic character of the buildings will be lost forever, and future generations cannot have聽this solid聽link to the past.鈥澛

Another聽motivation to聽invest in conserving聽historical聽buildings聽was being able to change聽the original use of earthquake-prone historical buildings.聽聽

鈥淔rom this I聽developed a聽performance-based聽framework that guided stakeholders to聽prioritise聽these聽earthquake-prone historical buildings for聽adaptive reuse.鈥澛

Originally from聽Oza-Nogogo聽in聽Ika-South local government area of Delta聽State,聽Nigeria, and聽born and raised in the ancient city of Benin, Nigeria, Dr聽Aigwi聽said she thoroughly enjoyed travelling around New Zealand for her PhD.聽

鈥淚聽really聽appreciated聽the stunning views and聽landscapes聽of New Zealand聽during those days of flying and driving around聽different cities in the聽North and South Islands of New Zealand.鈥澛犅

Dr聽Aigwi聽says she聽met great聽lifetime friends聽and colleagues聽during聽her聽studies at 暴风资源聽and encourages others to do a PhD.

鈥淭hey should shift their focus from just studying to get a PhD degree to solving real-life problems.聽It鈥檚 much聽more satisfying.鈥澛